Our Blog
Keep up with the latest news and LESA updates
- All
- Alberta Courts
- Business Law
- Civil Litigation
- Criminal Law
- Diversity
- Family Law
- LESA Classroom
- LESA Update
- Practice Management
- Real Estate
- Specialized Areas of Law
- Updates in Law
- Wills and Estates
- All
- Alberta Courts
- Business Law
- Civil Litigation
- Criminal Law
- Diversity
- Family Law
- LESA Classroom
- LESA Update
- Practice Management
- Real Estate
- Specialized Areas of Law
- Updates in Law
- Wills and Estates
Wills and Estates Practitioners: Save with the Summer Reading Sale!
Increases in Court Filing Fees Announced
Save on Real Estate papers and publications with the Summer Reading Sale!
Summer Reading Sale for Family Law
Criminal Lawyers: Check out the LESA Summer Reading Sale
Supreme Court Confirms the Complainant’s Sexual Inactivity is Presumptively Inadmissible: R v Kinamore
Wills and Estates Practitioners: Save with the Summer Reading Sale!
Save on papers and publications with LESA’s Summer Reading Sale! Get $100 off the purchase of a hardcopy publication (new purchases only) and 10% off all LESA papers, from
Increases in Court Filing Fees Announced
Court fees have increased in the Alberta Courts which impact all levels of court procedure including filing fees and court transcript fees. The Alberta Rules of Court Amendment Regulation introduce
Save on Real Estate papers and publications with the Summer Reading Sale!
Don’t miss the Summer Reading Sale! Get $100 off the purchase of a hardcopy publication (new purchases only) and 10% off all LESA papers, from now until August 31.
Summer Reading Sale for Family Law
Sale! Papers and Publications 10% off papers | $100 off hardcopy publications Don’t miss the LESA Summer Reading Sale! Get $100 off the purchase of a hardcopy publication (new purchases
Criminal Lawyers: Check out the LESA Summer Reading Sale
Save on papers and publications with LESA’s Summer Reading Sale! Get $100 off the purchase of a hardcopy publication (new purchases only) and 10% off all LESA papers, from
Supreme Court Confirms the Complainant’s Sexual Inactivity is Presumptively Inadmissible: R v Kinamore
In R v Kinamore, 2025 SCC 19, the Crown asked to clarify the rules for when Crown, rather than the accused, uses evidence of a complainant’s sexual history. Under section
