Mens Rea in Refusal Cases
Author: Katherin Beyak
This paper discusses the implications of the change in wording of a refusal charge under section 320.15 of the Criminal Code. The paper examines the elements of a refusal charge and what the Crown needs to prove. It identifies the conflicting lines of jurisprudence related to proof of mens rea, and it explores what may be constituted as a reasonable excuse for non-compliance.
This paper is part of a collection presented at LESA’s Impaired Driving program in Calgary on October 25, 2019 and in Edmonton on November 1, 2019.
These materials are an electronic product in Adobe PDF format. Shortly after your purchase, you will receive an email with instructions on how to download the complete PDF.
Click here to view some sample pages.
This paper is also offered as part of a Seminar on Demand. Purchasing the Seminar on Demand allows you to stream video recordings of seminar presentations and download PDF materials.